BAIT
GCN2
AAS1, AAS102, NDR2, serine/threonine-protein kinase GCN2, L000000681, YDR283C
Protein kinase; phosphorylates the alpha-subunit of translation initiation factor eIF2 (Sui2p) in response to starvation; activated by uncharged tRNAs and the Gcn1p-Gcn20p complex; contributes to DNA damage checkpoint control
GO Process (5)
GO Function (2)
GO Component (1)
Gene Ontology Biological Process
Gene Ontology Molecular Function
Gene Ontology Cellular Component
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
PREY
GET2
HUR2, RMD7, YER083C
Subunit of the GET complex; involved in insertion of proteins into the ER membrane; required for the retrieval of HDEL proteins from the Golgi to the ER in an ERD2 dependent fashion and for meiotic nuclear division
GO Process (2)
GO Function (1)
GO Component (3)
Gene Ontology Biological Process
Gene Ontology Molecular Function
Gene Ontology Cellular Component
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
Negative Genetic
Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.
Publication
Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network.
Reversible protein phosphorylation is a signaling mechanism involved in all cellular processes. To create a systems view of the signaling apparatus in budding yeast, we generated an epistatic miniarray profile (E-MAP) comprised of 100,000 pairwise, quantitative genetic interactions, including virtually all protein and small-molecule kinases and phosphatases as well as key cellular regulators. Quantitative genetic interaction mapping reveals factors working ... [more]
Cell Mar. 06, 2009; 136(5);952-63 [Pubmed: 19269370]
Quantitative Score
- -5.568805 [SGA Score]
Throughput
- High Throughput
Ontology Terms
- phenotype: colony size (APO:0000063)
Additional Notes
- An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) analysis was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (suppression) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethality).
Curated By
- BioGRID