BAIT

RPN4

SON1, UFD5, stress-regulated transcription factor RPN4, L000001984, YDL020C
Transcription factor that stimulates expression of proteasome genes; Rpn4p levels are in turn regulated by the 26S proteasome in a negative feedback control mechanism; RPN4 is transcriptionally regulated by various stress responses; relative distribution to the nucleus increases upon DNA replication stress
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
PREY

HSM3

L000004729, YBR272C
Proteasome-interacting protein; involved in the assembly of the base subcomplex of the 19S proteasomal regulatory particle (RP); involved in DNA mismatch repair during slow growth; weak similarity to Msh1p; related to human 19S subunit S5b; structural study suggests Hsm3p is a scaffold protein for Rpt1p-Rpt2p complex formation
UPS Project
GO Process (2)
GO Function (0)
GO Component (4)

Gene Ontology Biological Process

Gene Ontology Cellular Component

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)

Negative Genetic

Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.

Publication

Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map.

Collins SR, Miller KM, Maas NL, Roguev A, Fillingham J, Chu CS, Schuldiner M, Gebbia M, Recht J, Shales M, Ding H, Xu H, Han J, Ingvarsdottir K, Cheng B, Andrews B, Boone C, Berger SL, Hieter P, Zhang Z, Brown GW, Ingles CJ, Emili A, Allis CD, Toczyski DP, Weissman JS, Greenblatt JF, Krogan NJ

Defining the functional relationships between proteins is critical for understanding virtually all aspects of cell biology. Large-scale identification of protein complexes has provided one important step towards this goal; however, even knowledge of the stoichiometry, affinity and lifetime of every protein-protein interaction would not reveal the functional relationships between and within such complexes. Genetic interactions can provide functional information that ... [more]

Nature Apr. 12, 2007; 446(7137);806-10 [Pubmed: 17314980]

Quantitative Score

  • -10.592848 [SGA Score]

Throughput

  • High Throughput

Ontology Terms

  • phenotype: colony size (APO:0000063)

Additional Notes

  • An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) analysis was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.5 for positive interactions (suppression) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethality).

Related interactions

InteractionExperimental Evidence CodeDatasetThroughputScoreCurated ByNotes
RPN4 HSM3
Negative Genetic
Negative Genetic

Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.

High-0.2169BioGRID
364726
RPN4 HSM3
Negative Genetic
Negative Genetic

Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.

High-0.1956BioGRID
2088806
RPN4 HSM3
Synthetic Lethality
Synthetic Lethality

A genetic interaction is inferred when mutations or deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, result in lethality when combined in the same cell under a given condition.

Low-BioGRID
341259

Curated By

  • BioGRID