BAIT

SEH1

L000003153, YGL100W
Component of two distinct complexes; subunit of the Nup84 nuclear pore sub-complex (NPC) and the Seh1-associated (SEA) complex; the the NUP84 subcomplex contributes to nucleocytoplasmic transport and NPC biogenesis; the SEA complex is a coatamer-related complex that associates dynamically with the vacuole; homologous to human SEH1
GO Process (1)
GO Function (1)
GO Component (5)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
PREY

CSN9

S000007578, YDR179C
Subunit of the Cop9 signalosome; Cop9 signalosome is required for deneddylation, or removal of the ubiquitin-like protein Rub1p from Cdc53p (cullin); involved in adaptation to pheromone signaling
GO Process (2)
GO Function (0)
GO Component (1)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)

Negative Genetic

Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.

Publication

A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing.

Wilmes GM, Bergkessel M, Bandyopadhyay S, Shales M, Braberg H, Cagney G, Collins SR, Whitworth GB, Kress TL, Weissman JS, Ideker T, Guthrie C, Krogan NJ

We used a quantitative, high-density genetic interaction map, or E-MAP (Epistatic MiniArray Profile), to interrogate the relationships within and between RNA-processing pathways. Due to their complexity and the essential roles of many of the components, these pathways have been difficult to functionally dissect. Here, we report the results for 107,155 individual interactions involving 552 mutations, 166 of which are hypomorphic ... [more]

Mol. Cell Dec. 05, 2008; 32(5);735-46 [Pubmed: 19061648]

Quantitative Score

  • -10.050133 [SGA Score]

Throughput

  • High Throughput

Ontology Terms

  • phenotype: colony size (APO:0000063)

Additional Notes

  • An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) analysis was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.5 for positive interactions (suppression) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethality).

Curated By

  • BioGRID