BAIT
UBP6
L000004586, YFR010W
Ubiquitin-specific protease; situated in the base subcomplex of the 26S proteasome, releases free ubiquitin from branched polyubiquitin chains; negatively regulates degradation of ubiquitinated proteins by the proteasome; works in opposition to Hul5p polyubiquitin elongation activity; mutant has aneuploidy tolerance
GO Process (2)
GO Function (1)
GO Component (2)
Gene Ontology Biological Process
Gene Ontology Molecular Function
Gene Ontology Cellular Component
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
PREY
GIM4
PFD2, L000004368, YEL003W
Subunit of the heterohexameric cochaperone prefoldin complex; complex binds specifically to cytosolic chaperonin and transfers target proteins to it
GO Process (1)
GO Function (1)
GO Component (2)
Gene Ontology Biological Process
Gene Ontology Molecular Function
Gene Ontology Cellular Component
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
Positive Genetic
Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a less severe fitness defect than expected under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.
Publication
A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing.
We used a quantitative, high-density genetic interaction map, or E-MAP (Epistatic MiniArray Profile), to interrogate the relationships within and between RNA-processing pathways. Due to their complexity and the essential roles of many of the components, these pathways have been difficult to functionally dissect. Here, we report the results for 107,155 individual interactions involving 552 mutations, 166 of which are hypomorphic ... [more]
Mol. Cell Dec. 05, 2008; 32(5);735-46 [Pubmed: 19061648]
Quantitative Score
- 2.061096 [SGA Score]
Throughput
- High Throughput
Ontology Terms
- colony size (APO:0000063)
Additional Notes
- An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) analysis was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.5 for positive interactions (suppression) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethality).
Curated By
- BioGRID