BAIT
PHO3
acid phosphatase PHO3, phoC, L000001419, YBR092C
Constitutively expressed acid phosphatase similar to Pho5p; brought to the cell surface by transport vesicles; hydrolyzes thiamin phosphates in the periplasmic space, increasing cellular thiamin uptake; expression is repressed by thiamin
GO Process (2)
GO Function (1)
GO Component (1)
Gene Ontology Biological Process
Gene Ontology Molecular Function
Gene Ontology Cellular Component
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
PREY
LSB6
1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase LSB6, YJL100W
Type II phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase; binds Las17p, a homolog of human Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome protein involved in actin patch assembly and actin polymerization
GO Process (1)
GO Function (1)
GO Component (3)
Gene Ontology Biological Process
Gene Ontology Molecular Function
Gene Ontology Cellular Component
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
Negative Genetic
Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.
Publication
Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network.
Reversible protein phosphorylation is a signaling mechanism involved in all cellular processes. To create a systems view of the signaling apparatus in budding yeast, we generated an epistatic miniarray profile (E-MAP) comprised of 100,000 pairwise, quantitative genetic interactions, including virtually all protein and small-molecule kinases and phosphatases as well as key cellular regulators. Quantitative genetic interaction mapping reveals factors working ... [more]
Cell Mar. 06, 2009; 136(5);952-63 [Pubmed: 19269370]
Quantitative Score
- -7.923171 [SGA Score]
Throughput
- High Throughput
Ontology Terms
- phenotype: colony size (APO:0000063)
Additional Notes
- An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) analysis was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (suppression) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethality).
Curated By
- BioGRID