BAIT

SSM4

DOA10, KIS3, E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SSM4, L000002087, YIL030C
Ubiquitin-protein ligase involved in ER-associated protein degradation; located in the ER/nuclear envelope; ssm4 mutation suppresses mRNA instability caused by an rna14 mutation
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
PREY

SHP1

UBX1, protein phosphatase regulator SHP1, L000002746, YBL058W
UBX (ubiquitin regulatory X) domain-containing protein; regulates Glc7p phosphatase activity; shp1 mutants are impaired in growth and mitotic progression; functions in growth and mitotic progression require Cdc48p binding; mitotic phenotype is caused by reduced Glc7p activity; interacts with ubiquitylated proteins, required for degradation of a ubiquitylated model substrate
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)

Negative Genetic

Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.

Publication

A Lipid E-MAP Identifies Ubx2 as a Critical Regulator of Lipid Saturation and Lipid Bilayer Stress.

Surma MA, Klose C, Peng D, Shales M, Mrejen C, Stefanko A, Braberg H, Gordon DE, Vorkel D, Ejsing CS, Farese R, Simons K, Krogan NJ, Ernst R

Biological membranes are complex, and the mechanisms underlying their homeostasis are incompletely understood. Here, we present a quantitative genetic interaction map (E-MAP) focused on various aspects of lipid biology, including lipid metabolism, sorting, and trafficking. This E-MAP contains ∼250,000 negative and positive genetic interaction scores and identifies a molecular crosstalk of protein quality control pathways with lipid bilayer homeostasis. Ubx2p, ... [more]

Mol. Cell Aug. 22, 2013; 51(4);519-30 [Pubmed: 23891562]

Quantitative Score

  • -2.79695 [S score]

Throughput

  • High Throughput

Ontology Terms

  • phenotype: colony size (APO:0000063)

Additional Notes

  • An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) analysis was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.5 for positive interactions (suppression) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethality).

Curated By

  • BioGRID