BAIT

SAP190

L000002600, YKR028W
Protein that forms a complex with the Sit4p protein phosphatase; required for Sit4p function; member of a family of similar proteins including Sap4p, Sap155p, and Sap185p; SAP190 has a paralog, SAP185, that arose from the whole genome duplication
GO Process (4)
GO Function (0)
GO Component (1)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
PREY

GCN2

AAS1, AAS102, NDR2, serine/threonine-protein kinase GCN2, L000000681, YDR283C
Protein kinase; phosphorylates the alpha-subunit of translation initiation factor eIF2 (Sui2p) in response to starvation; activated by uncharged tRNAs and the Gcn1p-Gcn20p complex; contributes to DNA damage checkpoint control
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)

Negative Genetic

Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.

Publication

Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network.

Fiedler D, Braberg H, Mehta M, Chechik G, Cagney G, Mukherjee P, Silva AC, Shales M, Collins SR, van Wageningen S, Kemmeren P, Holstege FC, Weissman JS, Keogh MC, Koller D, Shokat KM, Krogan NJ

Reversible protein phosphorylation is a signaling mechanism involved in all cellular processes. To create a systems view of the signaling apparatus in budding yeast, we generated an epistatic miniarray profile (E-MAP) comprised of 100,000 pairwise, quantitative genetic interactions, including virtually all protein and small-molecule kinases and phosphatases as well as key cellular regulators. Quantitative genetic interaction mapping reveals factors working ... [more]

Cell Mar. 06, 2009; 136(5);952-63 [Pubmed: 19269370]

Quantitative Score

  • -2.718363 [SGA Score]

Throughput

  • High Throughput

Ontology Terms

  • phenotype: colony size (APO:0000063)

Additional Notes

  • An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) analysis was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (suppression) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethality).

Curated By

  • BioGRID