BAIT

PHO3

acid phosphatase PHO3, phoC, L000001419, YBR092C
Constitutively expressed acid phosphatase similar to Pho5p; brought to the cell surface by transport vesicles; hydrolyzes thiamin phosphates in the periplasmic space, increasing cellular thiamin uptake; expression is repressed by thiamin
GO Process (2)
GO Function (1)
GO Component (1)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)
PREY

PKP1

protein kinase PKP1, YIL042C
Mitochondrial protein kinase; involved in negative regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity by phosphorylating the ser-133 residue of the Pda1p subunit; acts in concert with kinase Pkp2p and phosphatases Ptc5p and Ptc6p
GO Process (3)
GO Function (2)
GO Component (1)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S288c)

Negative Genetic

Mutations/deletions in separate genes, each of which alone causes a minimal phenotype, but when combined in the same cell results in a more severe fitness defect or lethality under a given condition. This term is reserved for high or low throughput studies with scores.

Publication

Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network.

Fiedler D, Braberg H, Mehta M, Chechik G, Cagney G, Mukherjee P, Silva AC, Shales M, Collins SR, van Wageningen S, Kemmeren P, Holstege FC, Weissman JS, Keogh MC, Koller D, Shokat KM, Krogan NJ

Reversible protein phosphorylation is a signaling mechanism involved in all cellular processes. To create a systems view of the signaling apparatus in budding yeast, we generated an epistatic miniarray profile (E-MAP) comprised of 100,000 pairwise, quantitative genetic interactions, including virtually all protein and small-molecule kinases and phosphatases as well as key cellular regulators. Quantitative genetic interaction mapping reveals factors working ... [more]

Cell Mar. 06, 2009; 136(5);952-63 [Pubmed: 19269370]

Quantitative Score

  • -3.715878 [SGA Score]

Throughput

  • High Throughput

Ontology Terms

  • phenotype: colony size (APO:0000063)

Additional Notes

  • An Epistatic MiniArray Profile (E-MAP) analysis was used to quantitatively score genetic interactions based on fitness defects estimated from the colony size of double versus single mutants. Genetic interactions were considered significant if they had an S score > 2.0 for positive interactions (suppression) and S score < -2.5 for negative interactions (synthetic sick/lethality).

Curated By

  • BioGRID